We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ipfs-rust/unixfsv1@6453d9b introduced a ca. 10% slowdown in the unixfs-v1 benchmarks (I first ran the new, then the old):
adder/175 time: [51.599 us 51.613 us 51.630 us] thrpt: [3.2325 MiB/s 3.2335 MiB/s 3.2344 MiB/s] change: time: [-0.2399% -0.1194% -0.0202%] (p = 0.03 < 0.05) thrpt: [+0.0202% +0.1195% +0.2405%] Change within noise threshold. Found 3 outliers among 30 measurements (10.00%) 2 (6.67%) high mild 1 (3.33%) high severe adder/30277 time: [9.2331 ms 9.2395 ms 9.2469 ms] thrpt: [3.1226 MiB/s 3.1251 MiB/s 3.1273 MiB/s] change: time: [-7.2410% -7.1500% -7.0590%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05) thrpt: [+7.5951% +7.7006% +7.8063%] Performance has improved. Found 1 outliers among 30 measurements (3.33%) 1 (3.33%) high mild adder/60553 time: [22.040 ms 22.051 ms 22.061 ms] thrpt: [2.6176 MiB/s 2.6189 MiB/s 2.6201 MiB/s] change: time: [-9.5500% -9.4965% -9.4400%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05) thrpt: [+10.424% +10.493% +10.558%] Performance has improved.
Haven’t looked further yet (need to finish a larger upgrade first).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
ipfs-rust/unixfsv1@6453d9b introduced a ca. 10% slowdown in the unixfs-v1 benchmarks (I first ran the new, then the old):
Haven’t looked further yet (need to finish a larger upgrade first).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: