Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

License does not protect mod name #31

Open
jakimfett opened this issue May 13, 2015 · 5 comments
Open

License does not protect mod name #31

jakimfett opened this issue May 13, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@jakimfett
Copy link
Collaborator

Need to add language that provides protection of a mod's name.

Care needs to be taken that this doesn't get too broad...eg, Minechem is pretty unique, but a name like "Crafting Mod" might be to generic...should probably look at trademark law to see if this is even necessary.

@LokiChaos
Copy link

While it varies depending on the jurisdiction, generally for protection a trademark must be registered. Protection of names/titles is not under the scope of copyright law and at best you could require that derivative forms be distributed under a different name to avoid confusion as a requirement for permission to distribute derivatives. There is no way to enforce a claim to just a name in isolation without registering the trademark. Eg: Another party is completely free to name a mod they made the same as your mod, and the license on your mod is irrelevant nor can be used to prevent them from doing so (unless they actually use code or other copyrightable assets in their mod).

@coolsquid
Copy link
Contributor

at best you could require that derivative forms be distributed under a different name to avoid confusion as a requirement for permission to distribute derivatives

I'm quite sure that's what he meant.

@LokiChaos
Copy link

I would look at the Apache 1.1 license for wording and the limits on what you could likely impose: https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:Apache1.1 Specifically sections 4 and 5.

Reasonable limits on the enforceability for generic/descriptive names would obviously apply.

@maxashen
Copy link

Specifically §12.2 may not be enforceable under copyright law:

The Author retains the right to the Mod name.

Basically the present text is asking telling the User that the Author has rights to the Mod name, which implies an agreement between the Author and third parties (usually trademark as LokiChaos stated).

Instead it could be moved into §7 (Right to derive) and §9 (Right to distribute addons).

@jakimfett
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Probably the way it'll end up being handled is via an "implied rights" section, where things covered in other law (eg, trademark law) are briefly mentioned as a short list of "including but not limited to..." protections for a mod author.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants