Incorporate benchmarking into notebooks

[amsnyder]

Currently using HYSEP values for some benchmarking in the notebooks.

@sfoks is computing benchmark results ahead of time so easy to pull in.

@sfoks is currently doing everything by native model resolutions as well as HUC12s, but we might need to get everything to have values by HRU?

Additional Notes

Benchmarking results (published)

Currently published are benchmarking results are at streamflow locations (point locations/lat-longs) only. We have a 'standard suite' and a 'dscore' evaluation for streamflow (those datasets are now on OSN).

We also will have streamflow drought benchmarking results (a subset of locations in the regular streamflow benchmarking approach; here and here, w/ estimated publication expected late Oct/ early Nov 2024). These cover the modeling applications NHM v1.0 byHWobs and NWM v2.1 retrospective (same modeling applications as the regular streamflow evaluations in the paragraph above).

Benchmarking results (in draft)

We are working this year to examine evapotranspiration and snow water equivalent (SWE) at the native modeling spatial unit (hydrologic response units - HRUs for NHM-PRMS applications) and at the HUC12 spatial units (specifically the watershed boundary dataset version specified in this link).

Ideas

• Merge the benchmarking results we do have with locations/spatial regions (HRUs, point locs) of interest (in notebooks).
• Compute metrics in notebooks for point locations that we don't examine in our analyses (this is particular to streamflow atm). For instance, Eddie and Matt might have additional streamflow locations (points of interest, POIs) for the Oregon Recharge Project which may be a denser network than what we are working with currently for the national benchmarking applications.