-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Agent that manages a RWO? #40
Comments
What is the assumption of the role of the holding institution? Physical custody? Legal ownership? Something else? |
I think custody rather than ownership. The institution doesn't necessarily own the objects that it holds, but it does at least have custody of them. |
A few (not closely considered) options. (also cc @guegueng):
|
I'm not keen on either, as there's no agency involved. A place does not look after an object nor does a Statement. |
Agreed. How about |
(Looking at DM2E, we could also then add |
I'm happy with domain and range of Would we prefer DM2E or CRM? There's also: crm:P50_has_current_keeper |
Hmm... I lean towards DM2E (because it's opinionated in an EDM direction), but I could be flexible. |
I'm cool with DM2E, and we already have an EDM/DPLA baseline so doesn't make sense to stray further than necessary. |
Need a predicate for holding institution. E.g. if some agent is the creator, and then donates the object/collection to an institution to look after, but still retains ownership ... what's the relationship between the object and the institution?
It's not the publisher (it could be locked away in a vault, this is the RWO collection, not the digital representation) or the rightsHolder (the creator is still the rights holder), nor a creator nor contributor ... so we're outside of DPLA MAP.
marcrel has:
Which seems pretty much what we want?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: