Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Agent that manages a RWO? #40

Open
azaroth42 opened this issue Apr 15, 2016 · 9 comments
Open

Agent that manages a RWO? #40

azaroth42 opened this issue Apr 15, 2016 · 9 comments

Comments

@azaroth42
Copy link
Contributor

Need a predicate for holding institution. E.g. if some agent is the creator, and then donates the object/collection to an institution to look after, but still retains ownership ... what's the relationship between the object and the institution?

It's not the publisher (it could be locked away in a vault, this is the RWO collection, not the digital representation) or the rightsHolder (the creator is still the rights holder), nor a creator nor contributor ... so we're outside of DPLA MAP.

marcrel has:

  • Repository: An organization that hosts data or material culture objects and provides services to promote long term, consistent and shared use of those data or objects

Which seems pretty much what we want?

@anarchivist
Copy link
Member

What is the assumption of the role of the holding institution? Physical custody? Legal ownership? Something else?

@azaroth42
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think custody rather than ownership. The institution doesn't necessarily own the objects that it holds, but it does at least have custody of them.

@anarchivist
Copy link
Member

anarchivist commented Apr 21, 2016

A few (not closely considered) options. (also cc @guegueng):

  • dct:provenance (range: dct:ProvenanceStatement)
  • edm:currentLocation (range: edm:Place)

@azaroth42
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm not keen on either, as there's no agency involved. A place does not look after an object nor does a Statement.

@anarchivist
Copy link
Member

Agreed. How about dm2e:holdingInstitution?

@anarchivist
Copy link
Member

(Looking at DM2E, we could also then add dm2e:owner if we had use cases for it.)

@azaroth42
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm happy with domain and range of holdingInstitution. We'd not want to use it on a pcdm:Object (as then it would become a ProvidedCHO) but that's okay.

Would we prefer DM2E or CRM? There's also: crm:P50_has_current_keeper
Domain of Physical Thing, range of Actor

@anarchivist
Copy link
Member

Would we prefer DM2E or CRM?

Hmm... I lean towards DM2E (because it's opinionated in an EDM direction), but I could be flexible.

@azaroth42
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm cool with DM2E, and we already have an EDM/DPLA baseline so doesn't make sense to stray further than necessary.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants