You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dear authors,
Thank you so much for your amazing work.
In the process of using your model I realized that in case I write a prompt with the object that is not present in the image (i.e I tried finding dinosaur in the picture with pizzas, it found the the dinosaur that is not present in the picture).
It seems like the model was not trained on negative examples.
Can you, please, resolve this issue as it will significantly increase the usability of your model.
Thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
You are right. There were no negative examples in training datasets. We are looking for datasets containing negative examples. Currently we only find G-RefCOCO containing a few negative examples but its other labels are poor, leading to performance decrease. We will try to annotate some data through foundation models. Thank you for your nice advice!
We've employed G-RefCOCO to joint train our model but find that such cases still exist. Honestly it is a shared problem of existing RES models because of limited negative examples in availabel datasets. Currently we are focusing on extending model's ability in more segmentation areas and would deal with the recall problem in the long future.
Dear authors,
Thank you so much for your amazing work.
In the process of using your model I realized that in case I write a prompt with the object that is not present in the image (i.e I tried finding dinosaur in the picture with pizzas, it found the the dinosaur that is not present in the picture).
It seems like the model was not trained on negative examples.
Can you, please, resolve this issue as it will significantly increase the usability of your model.
Thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: