Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update hbzId #231

Open
acka47 opened this issue Sep 20, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Update hbzId #231

acka47 opened this issue Sep 20, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@acka47
Copy link
Contributor

acka47 commented Sep 20, 2024

Here is the current description:

rdfs:comment "HT-Nummer. Der Identifier, der einer bibliographischen Ressource im hbz-Verbundkatalog zugewiesen wurde."@de ;
rdfs:comment "The identifier that is assigned to a bibliographic resource in the hbz union catalogue."@en ;

This isn't correct anymore as by now the Alma-MMS-ID is the main ID in the union catalogue. We will have to update the description.

@acka47 acka47 changed the title Update description for hbzId Update hbzId Sep 20, 2024
@acka47
Copy link
Contributor Author

acka47 commented Sep 20, 2024

We should discuss whether rdfs:label also needs adjustment.

@blackwinter
Copy link
Member

What's wrong with this description? Except that ZDB titles are no longer assigned an hbz ID.

The Alma MMS ID is a vendor-specific identifier, the hbz ID is vendor-independent. At least in my understanding.

@TobiasNx
Copy link
Contributor

What's wrong with this description? Except that ZDB titles are no longer assigned an hbz ID.

The Alma MMS ID is a vendor-specific identifier, the hbz ID is vendor-independent. At least in my understanding.

I want to second that. Only records that are "truly" or were records in the "Verbundkatalog" get a hbzId. ALMA has a lot more records than the NZ/Verbundkatalog also CZ and local records. All of them have almaMmsIds but none of them have a hbzId.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants