Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

360 images are not displayed correctly #154

Open
wilfredor opened this issue Oct 2, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

360 images are not displayed correctly #154

wilfredor opened this issue Oct 2, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@wilfredor
Copy link

Recently I had a conversation with others WLM participating users and commons users about the images in 360 degrees. It's important that the WLM jury can access to evaluate 360 images using montage.

Example:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Panorama_360_of_Basilique_Saint-Patrick,_Montreal,_Quebec,_Canada.jpg

How the image should be displayed
https://tools.wmflabs.org/panoviewer/#Panorama_360_of_Basilique_Saint-Patrick,_Montreal,_Quebec,_Canada.jpg

Thanks

@slaporte
Copy link
Member

slaporte commented Oct 2, 2019

Nice example.

Panoviewer uses pannellum. We could try including that in the juror interface, or at the very least link to panoviewer. We would need some way to detect if a file is a 360 image -- I'm not sure about the best method to do that.

@wilfredor
Copy link
Author

wilfredor commented Oct 2, 2019

I think one of the methods could be, to verify the image description page and check if it has the template {{Pano360}} or the category [[Category: 360 ° panoramas]]

There are two good conditions to start, however, in the future more conditions could be added

@wilfredor
Copy link
Author

Another idea is just let a link to see the image 360, however, without any condition. I prefer the category condition because all 360 images should have this category

@lgelauff
Copy link
Collaborator

A search online suggests that detecting panoramas is not straight forward from the metadata. Using pannellum with recognition through category (or structured data anyone?) sounds like a great approach.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants