Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support new oneof feature #95

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 23, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

Support new oneof feature #95

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 23, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

Currently, trying to compile a .proto file using new "oneof" feature with 
protogen will make protoc display the following errors:

meta_data2.proto:8:5: Expected "required", "optional", or "repeated".
meta_data2.proto:8:19: Expected field number.

This is of course because the protoc version used by protobuf-csharp-port is 
old and the feature is new. Since oneof is a very desirable feature, it would 
be nice if protobuf-csharp-port would support it.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 14 Nov 2014 at 3:58

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Yes, agreed - there's a bunch of work I want to do to bring the project up to 
speed with the original project, but I don't have time right now. It's not just 
a matter of updating protoc... there's the code to support it in C# that needs 
writing too :)

I don't have a time frame for this right now, but it *is* on my list...

Original comment by [email protected] on 14 Nov 2014 at 4:01

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Most appreciated Jon

Original comment by [email protected] on 25 Nov 2014 at 7:22

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Any news on getting 2.6 support?

Original comment by [email protected] on 6 Feb 2015 at 9:09

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

There are plans to go straight to 3.0. I'm not in a position to give details 
about anything right now, but I definitely intend it to happen. Sorry I can't 
be any more specific.

Original comment by jonathan.skeet on 6 Feb 2015 at 10:24

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant