We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
lifted
The package has flag lifted to "run the tests against Shelly.Lifted":
Shelly.Lifted
Shelly.hs/shelly.cabal
Lines 98 to 100 in 4fe64d6
$ cabal build -f+lifted --enable-tests Build profile: -w ghc-9.2.1 -O1 In order, the following will be built (use -v for more details): - shelly-1.9.0 (test:shelly-testsuite) (file test/src/TestInit.hs changed) Preprocessing test suite 'shelly-testsuite' for shelly-1.9.0.. Building test suite 'shelly-testsuite' for shelly-1.9.0.. [ 4 of 15] Compiling RunSpec ( test/src/RunSpec.hs, /Users/abel/bin/src/Shelly.hs/dist-newstyle/build/x86_64-osx/ghc-9.2.1/shelly-1.9.0/t/shelly-testsuite/build/shelly-testsuite/shelly-testsuite-tmp/RunSpec.o ) [flags changed] test/src/RunSpec.hs:26:23: error: Variable not in scope: onCommandHandles :: t6 -> m0 T.Text -> Sh a9 | 26 | res <- shelly $ onCommandHandles (initOutputHandles (flip hSetBinaryMode True)) | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ test/src/RunSpec.hs:26:41: error: Variable not in scope: initOutputHandles :: (Handle -> IO ()) -> t6 | 26 | res <- shelly $ onCommandHandles (initOutputHandles (flip hSetBinaryMode True)) | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ test/src/RunSpec.hs:35:23: error: Variable not in scope: bash :: t5 -> [a7] -> Sh a8 | 35 | res <- shelly $ bash "echo" [ "wibble" ] | ^^^^ ... ((ETC))
Should we remove it or let it keep rotting?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
The package has flag
lifted
to "run the tests againstShelly.Lifted
":Shelly.hs/shelly.cabal
Lines 98 to 100 in 4fe64d6
However, this probably hasn't been used in a long time. It is actually broken:
Should we remove it or let it keep rotting?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: