Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

python-monotonic should no longer be required on python > 3.3 #4863

Open
1 task done
joebonrichie opened this issue Jan 18, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #4864
Open
1 task done

python-monotonic should no longer be required on python > 3.3 #4863

joebonrichie opened this issue Jan 18, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #4864
Labels
Package: Removal Request Please consider removing this from the repository

Comments

@joebonrichie
Copy link
Contributor

Please confirm there isn't an open request for this package

  • I have searched through package removal requests

Name

python-monotonic

Last Update Date

April 2021

Link to an announcement of archival or deprecation, if applicable.

https://github.com/atdt/monotonic?tab=readme-ov-file#monotonic

Reason for removal

Python 3.3 standard library includes time.montonic()

@joebonrichie joebonrichie added the Package: Removal Request Please consider removing this from the repository label Jan 18, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Triage in Solus Jan 18, 2025
joebonrichie added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 18, 2025
**Summary**
- Package has no rundeps according to packaging.requirements script
- Part of #4863
joebonrichie added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 18, 2025
**Summary**
- Part of the python standard library since 3.3, closes #4863.
@joebonrichie joebonrichie linked a pull request Jan 18, 2025 that will close this issue
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Package: Removal Request Please consider removing this from the repository
Projects
Status: Triage
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant