Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DoQ (DNS-over-QUIC) support #288

Open
timkgh opened this issue Jun 13, 2021 · 7 comments
Open

DoQ (DNS-over-QUIC) support #288

timkgh opened this issue Jun 13, 2021 · 7 comments

Comments

@timkgh
Copy link

timkgh commented Jun 13, 2021

Any plans to support DoQ? If AdGuard becomes a default or an option in the default config (per #286), it would be very useful to support it:
https://adguard.com/en/blog/dns-over-quic.html

@saradickinson
Copy link
Contributor

@timkgh we would like to add DoQ support, but I suspect this will depend on the refactor providing DoH support. @wtoorop can probably say more...

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 16, 2021

Adguard doq can use on Android,but not on Windows PC.

@mdavids
Copy link

mdavids commented Jun 8, 2022

Any news?

@cherinyy
Copy link

cherinyy commented Dec 6, 2022

@timkgh we would like to add DoQ support, but I suspect this will depend on the refactor providing DoH support. @wtoorop can probably say more...

It is more similar to DoT in that it uses UDP transport on port 853.

Adguard doq can use on Android,but not on Windows PC.

It currently has an RFC: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9250

So I expect Stubby to support DoQ.

@Raviu56
Copy link

Raviu56 commented Aug 21, 2023

Any updates here? dns-over-quic doq is being now adapted by many main stream provides

@Raviu56
Copy link

Raviu56 commented Aug 21, 2023

dog and q dns clients provides native dns-over-quic support. By test q is much faster, this may help

@cryptonado
Copy link

Any particular plans to support DoQ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants