Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Batch management of mappings #713

Open
nichtich opened this issue May 22, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Batch management of mappings #713

nichtich opened this issue May 22, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
feature Additional functionality question Further discussion needed
Milestone

Comments

@nichtich
Copy link
Member

This issue subsumes multiple related feature request to allow management of multiple mappings without having to load each individual mapping into mapping editor. Some uses cases:

  • Create multiple mappings that only differ in source concept, e.g. several concepts in source vocabulary map to the same target concept with the same mapping type and same concordance (Idea: Batch creation of mappings #699)
  • Open a CSV file of mappings and check which of its mappings to save (Facilitate mapping with OpenRefine #606)
  • Review a list of mappings or mappings suggestions and save or skip mappings with one-click

The common pattern includes a list of mappings, each with status (saved/not saved) and at least the following actions:

  • create a new list of mappings (from search result or from CSV)
  • add a mapping to the list
  • remove a mapping from the list
  • flush list (remove all mappings)
  • change type of all mappings
  • change target concept of all mappings
  • save all mappings
  • save individual mapping

The editable list of mappings could be saved in the browser like favorite concepts or it could be non-persistent.

@nichtich nichtich added feature Additional functionality question Further discussion needed labels May 22, 2023
@nichtich nichtich added this to the 2.0.0 milestone May 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature Additional functionality question Further discussion needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant