Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Multiple correct answers #78

Open
chandru1782 opened this issue Nov 13, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Multiple correct answers #78

chandru1782 opened this issue Nov 13, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@chandru1782
Copy link

Hi,

Is it possible to add the option of supporting multiple correct answers in this type of question? For example, I would like to award grade point when it is either Item m followed by Item n or vice versa. That is the orderings "Item m followed by Item n" and "Item n followed by Item m" are both correct.

Please help and let me know if I can be of any use.

Thanks,
Chandru

@gbateson
Copy link
Owner

I see. Perhaps one way of doing this would be to allow multiple versions of the "correct" sequence. Then, when grading a student's response, we can work out the grades compared to each "correct" sequence and award the highest of those grades.

Could you give a concrete example? I'd like some idea of how many items are required? And how many "correct" sequences would suit your needs?

@chandru1782
Copy link
Author

Hi, Thank you for the reply. We try to use these type of questions for students of Mathematics. Assume that a student has to put the following sets in the order of inclusion.

  1. Empty set.
  2. The set of all real numbers whose square is negative.
  3. The set of all real numbers whose square is zero.

Here both sets in items 1 and 2 are empty. Therefore the orderings 1,2,3 and 2,1,3 are both correct.

In summary I would like to say that we might have to add provision for at most three different correct orderings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants