Consider labeling reference geonomes

[NoopDog]

From Terence Murphy

By NCBI’s reference genome classification (note we are retiring the term representative genome, see yesterday’s blog), ~387 of these are reference genomes. Here’s the docs on how we decide those. That doesn’t mean they’re all stellar; it just means that they’re better than the other options.
The rest correspond to additional strains, or older versions that may or may not still be in use.
Labeling the subset that are reference genomes and latest I think would be useful.