Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AggregationConfig restricts formula to a single microgrid #66

Open
cwasicki opened this issue Jan 3, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

AggregationConfig restricts formula to a single microgrid #66

cwasicki opened this issue Jan 3, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
part:proto Affects the protocol buffer definition files priority:❓ We need to figure out how soon this should be addressed type:bug Something isn't working

Comments

@cwasicki
Copy link
Contributor

cwasicki commented Jan 3, 2025

What happened?

The definition of the AggregationConfig allows only a single microgrid, which restricts formulas to only components of the same microgrid, see

What did you expect instead?

Formulas should be supported for compontents across multiple microgrids too.

Affected version(s)

No response

Affected part(s)

Protocol buffers (part:proto)

Extra information

Solutions could be:

  • Allow multiple microgrids: The service would need mapping to determine the microgrid which each component belongs to.
  • Remove MID from the requests: Planned for future anyway, but same mapping needed.
  • Include MID with the CID in the formula: Additional complexity in the formulas, undesirable since MIDs are going to be removed.

Note: Since CIDs are unique, MIDs are redundant information. At the moment the MID-CID mapping is still required for the service to work, but can be retrieved from the assets API in future. When available, MIDs are going to be removed from reporting API requests in future.

@cwasicki cwasicki added priority:❓ We need to figure out how soon this should be addressed type:bug Something isn't working labels Jan 3, 2025
@keywordlabeler keywordlabeler bot added the part:proto Affects the protocol buffer definition files label Jan 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
part:proto Affects the protocol buffer definition files priority:❓ We need to figure out how soon this should be addressed type:bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant