Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

empty efu_uri? #8

Open
theyaa opened this issue Jan 24, 2017 · 4 comments
Open

empty efu_uri? #8

theyaa opened this issue Jan 24, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@theyaa
Copy link

theyaa commented Jan 24, 2017

If I use a local OWL file, and leave the value for the efu_uri empty. Will the plugin be able to parse the text in the document I send to properly classify the document according to the OWL ontology?

Best.

Theyaa

@mattflax
Copy link
Collaborator

No, that is not something this plugin can do. I suggest you look at the Zooma tool, which may be useful to you. See http://www.ebi.ac.uk/spot/zooma/ for more details.

Thanks.

@dsmiley
Copy link

dsmiley commented Jan 24, 2017

Sorry this may be out of scope of this repo/issues here but related to Zooma... is the code behind that available? I was poking around the site but I didn't notice it.

I developed something called the SolrTextTagger which seems to be a little similar and I'm curious about what Zooma is doing internally -- how it works.

@tburdett
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi David, yes - the Zooma code is here: https://github.com/EBISPOT/zooma. I'd like to have a look at the SolrTextTagger in a bit more detail but my immediate reaction is that they're solving different problems in a manner that is potentially nicely complementary

@dsmiley
Copy link

dsmiley commented Jan 24, 2017

Thanks. Wow there's a lot of code there; it will take some time to explore to find the parts similar to the SolrTextTagger -- which is scanning text to look for words in a dictionary, in a nutshell. I agree that it's likely complementary.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants