Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Modify resource template to accommodate court cases #4191

Closed
4 tasks
Tracked by #190
JonellaCulmer opened this issue Nov 5, 2020 · 4 comments · Fixed by #5326
Closed
4 tasks
Tracked by #190

Modify resource template to accommodate court cases #4191

JonellaCulmer opened this issue Nov 5, 2020 · 4 comments · Fixed by #5326

Comments

@JonellaCulmer
Copy link
Contributor

JonellaCulmer commented Nov 5, 2020

What we're after:
To improve the usability of the court case pages, we need to update the resource template.

Related issues

Action items / requirements for completion

  • Adjust "hide title checkbox" to remove the line above the section title, not the entire title
  • Field for italicizing court cases in the title is added (like we have for press releases and Record articles)--
    image

Completion criteria

  • Court case names can be italicized in page header
  • Line above section headers is removed if there is no intro text to avoid double-line appearance
@JonellaCulmer JonellaCulmer added this to the PI 13 innovation 2 and PI 14 planning milestone Nov 5, 2020
@JonellaCulmer JonellaCulmer modified the milestones: Sprint 14.2, Sprint 14.4 Mar 2, 2021
@patphongs
Copy link
Member

@JonellaCulmer We're not using the Page number column anymore correct? The individual court case pages do not appear to cite the number of pages. And we also received agreement to remove page numbers from the individual audit page documents table, so we no longer need page numbers at all?

@patphongs
Copy link
Member

@JonellaCulmer Also, I don't think the initial implementation will include the sort functionality. The different offices who use this documents table may want to order the documents in a specific way.

@JonellaCulmer
Copy link
Contributor Author

@patphongs Yes, that all makes sense to me. We've more or less moved away from providing page numbers on Wagtail pages. We do, however, still provide them for filings on committee and candidate profile pages.

The sort functionality would be beneficial for individual who want to view the data in a different way. Are we able to have a default view, that individual offices can dictate and if a user wants to sort we can afford them that option?

@rfultz rfultz modified the milestones: Sprint 14.4, Sprint 14.5 Apr 6, 2021
@johnnyporkchops

This comment was marked as outdated.

@patphongs patphongs modified the milestones: Sprint 15.1, Sprint 16.1 May 20, 2021
@patphongs patphongs modified the milestones: Sprint 16.1, Sprint 16.5 Sep 23, 2021
@patphongs patphongs modified the milestones: Sprint 16.5, Sprint 16.6 Nov 17, 2021
@patphongs patphongs self-assigned this Dec 13, 2021
@rfultz rfultz modified the milestones: Sprint 16.6, Sprint 17.1 Dec 21, 2021
@patphongs patphongs removed this from the Sprint 17.1 milestone Jan 11, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

6 participants