No license present

[ahjones]

Howdy,

Thanks for the project.

I notice there's no license included. Would you mind adding one, please? If you were to ask me which I'd like, I'd answer Apache 2.0 https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.

BR

[fbs]

hi,

sorry totally missed the notification for this. Do you want a license on the RPM spec files or do you want the licenses of the various projects being built in here?

[problame]

I'm interested in a LICENSE file at the top of this repository that states under which license I may use the .spec files that you created here.

[fbs]

The bcc and bpftrace specs are based on those from fedora so I'd say its whatever license they use for the specfiles, which seems to be MIT: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main . The others are trivial but MIT license should be fine on those too