-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
armsr/armv8:generic ERROR: Sysupgrade type 'combined-efi' should be one of [ "combined", "rootfs" ] #21
Comments
Hmm, that's an odd one. This is on the armsr/armv8 target like in the graphic on your GH page? It looks like an EFI boot system is being detected in the container, but the build is only producing the non-EFI images (see https://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/targets/armsr/armv8/, no Could you check inside the container and see if it thinks it's EFI?
As a workaround try this; that final
|
Yes. For armsr I'm using the images generic-kernel.bin and https://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/targets/armsr/armv8/openwrt-armsr-armv8-generic-ext4-rootfs.img.gz. But I boot OpenWrt via EFI.
|
Update: Inside my OpenWrt Docker image I changed to the squashfs combined image (https://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/targets/armsr/armv8/openwrt-armsr-armv8-generic-squashfs-combined.img.gz). Unfortunately,
Maybe
|
Yeah, on current snapshot builds we're still dealing with that missing rpc call, but this one is something different for which I have not figured out a solution. On x86, the existence of that |
Now that I'm thinking about it, maybe it's some From the missing |
A bios mode (compared to x86) is not available on Arm targets. Arm devices are booting via device-tree (usually u-boot as bootloader) or via EFI. armsr stands for Arm SystemReady and is a generic image that boot on all devices that providing EFI-boot. I configured
Great idea! The developers who are maintaining the armsr target should know it. What I can say is that the |
Ask on IRC, no response, so reported it as openwrt/openwrt#16966 |
Thanks for your efforts. Let's see how openwrt/openwrt#12963 goes. Keeping names consistent is always a great idea. |
I don't know if this is really a bug but
owut
told me to report it ;-) .Background
I'm running OpenWrt via
qemu
in a container (https://github.com/AlbrechtL/openwrt-docker). I decided not to use the combined image, instead I use the kernel and the ext4 rootfs as separate images. Maybe it is time to overthink this decision... Anyway, I'm looking how to upgrade an OpenWrt installation without losing the user packages in aqemu
environment. For that reason I'm following your greatowut
development.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: