Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
It's not really necessary to include them once you have the random intercept, but if those factors are good predictors, they can absorb some of the random effects variance, increasing your statistical power and precision. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Happy New Year! I had a conceptual question about the inclusion of between-subjects covariates in a model where I am interested in within-subjects differences:
As background, I have paired data regarding the presence and absence of lesions in 3 regions from individual patients and I’m interested in the differences between those regions (ie within-subjects differences). I am running a mixed effects logistic regression with a random intercept for subject and extract the estimated marginal means before making pairwise comparisons between regions. However, I am wondering if there is any conceptual reason to include between-subjects covariates (ie age, sex, etc) in my model? In cases where I am making across-subject comparisons, I know that I typically include these types of covariates so that means are “adjusted”? However, in this case, I’m not making any across-subject comparisons but only within-subjects. Therefore, shouldn’t the paired nature of the data control for those between-subjects factors and including them in the model would be unnecessary?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions