Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Add support for Backup-BitLockerKeyProtector #7

Open
oct3net opened this issue Jun 17, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

Feature Request: Add support for Backup-BitLockerKeyProtector #7

oct3net opened this issue Jun 17, 2017 · 1 comment
Labels
help wanted The issue is up for grabs for anyone in the community. resource proposal The issue is proposing a new resource in the resource module.

Comments

@oct3net
Copy link

oct3net commented Jun 17, 2017

No description provided.

@johlju johlju added help wanted The issue is up for grabs for anyone in the community. resource proposal The issue is proposing a new resource in the resource module. labels May 16, 2018
@mhendric
Copy link
Contributor

@m3ch-mania , sorry for the extremely late response, but I wanted to get more information on what you are requesting. Are you asking for this to be a parameter to add the the BLBitlocker and BLAutoBitlocker resources, or are you asking for a new resource which would handle backing up key protectors? Also, key backup can be required/forced using Group Policy instead, and may be the preferred approach, as with the GPO in place, Bitlocker won't actually enable encryption until its confirmed that the key was in fact backed up. Is there a reason you'd prefer to do this via DSC?

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/information-protection/bitlocker/bitlocker-group-policy-settings

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted The issue is up for grabs for anyone in the community. resource proposal The issue is proposing a new resource in the resource module.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants