Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 25, 2022. It is now read-only.

JUnit5 #6

Open
ninewise opened this issue Aug 1, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

JUnit5 #6

ninewise opened this issue Aug 1, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@ninewise
Copy link

ninewise commented Aug 1, 2019

I should check how hard it is to switch to JUnit5.

Original issue by @ninewise on Tue May 22 2018 at 13:31.

@ninewise
Copy link
Author

ninewise commented Aug 1, 2019

https://www.baeldung.com/junit-5-migration

Original comment by @ninewise on Thu Dec 13 2018 at 15:38.

@bmesuere
Copy link
Member

bmesuere commented Aug 1, 2019

It seems not fully backwards compatible? If so, creating a new judge version (and thus requiring existing exercises to explicitly opt-in) seems like the way to go?

Original comment by @bmesuere on Thu Dec 13 2018 at 15:42.

@ninewise
Copy link
Author

ninewise commented Aug 1, 2019

They do seem to have a compatibility mode, but the exercises might still need some modification for it. So yeah, splitting the judge might be required.

Original comment by @ninewise on Thu Dec 13 2018 at 16:40.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants