Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

two different junction type for the same circ? #37

Open
alexey0308 opened this issue Apr 11, 2017 · 4 comments
Open

two different junction type for the same circ? #37

alexey0308 opened this issue Apr 11, 2017 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@alexey0308
Copy link
Contributor

alexey0308 commented Apr 11, 2017

Hi @tjakobi ,
is it correct to report two different junction types for the same circ coordinates?
The linear transcript counts are the same for both of them (see attached).
I think, only the first circ must be reported.

./CircCoordinates:3 63912588 63913225 ATXN7 1 + exon-exon
./CircCoordinates:3 63912588 63913225 N/A 2 - exon-exon

Regards,
Alex
bug.txt

@alexey0308 alexey0308 added the bug label Apr 11, 2017
@CDieterich
Copy link

Which data set are you using ?

@alexey0308
Copy link
Contributor Author

alexey0308 commented Apr 11, 2017

It is from the MCF7 results.

grep 63912588 /prj/MCF7_RNA_turnover_Naarmann/preprocessing/workflow/DCC/CircCoordinates

@CDieterich
Copy link

Ok, then it is indeed stranded RNA-seq and a case that we should look at in detail.

@tjakobi tjakobi added this to the DCC version 0.4.5 milestone Apr 18, 2017
@tjakobi tjakobi self-assigned this Apr 18, 2017
@tjakobi
Copy link
Contributor

tjakobi commented Sep 28, 2017

I'm not sure that this is an DCC issue. Looking in the junctions files provided to DCC I can see that there is something on the '-' strand that barely gets over the threshold. If I remember the format of the junctions files correctly, the splice type reported there is also 2 which is passed through by DCC.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants