Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider using Casa (or even ZFS) for Haddock storage #327

Open
chreekat opened this issue Apr 26, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Consider using Casa (or even ZFS) for Haddock storage #327

chreekat opened this issue Apr 26, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@chreekat
Copy link
Member

There are a lot of duplicate Haddock files generated, since each snapshot gets its own copy of every file.

If the files were stored in content-addressed storage, it would reduce the number of writes per snapshot, the amount of storage used, and the related expenses and disaster recovery considerations.

I mention ZFS because it supports transparent deduplication and compression. The server already uses ZFS; simply writing the files to disk in a correctly-configured dataset might be easy to implement.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant