Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Setup for working with Jekyll #1

Open
davidnuon opened this issue May 2, 2016 · 9 comments · May be fixed by #3
Open

Setup for working with Jekyll #1

davidnuon opened this issue May 2, 2016 · 9 comments · May be fixed by #3

Comments

@davidnuon
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@torch2424
Copy link
Member

I got this!

@torch2424 torch2424 linked a pull request May 4, 2016 that will close this issue
@rogerhoward
Copy link

Opened a PR on the Codeandcoffee repo: codeandcoffeelb/codeandcoffeelb.github.io#75

This supports Jekyll 3/Ruby 2 in a standalone Vagrant box. Feel free to carve it up and integrate it into this repo.

Just FYI, I'm not clear on why this repo exists (it's odd to me that you'd try to have a single Vagrant repo that supports other standalone repos). The only reason I've ever had a standalone Vagrant repo like this is if I have multiple repos, each containing a component of a larger application that have to all be merged together into a single provisioned box. I don't think that scenario fits this repo... Not meaning to bitch and moan, just not sure how to help with this.

@davidnuon
Copy link
Member Author

davidnuon commented May 4, 2016

My idea with this is to have one Vagrant box to handle multiple projects at once since some people like working in one box. I haven't written down a feature list yet, but I imagine including things like Cloud9 editor.

Compare this to projects like scotchbox or joomla-vagrantbox where you have multiple projects handled and managed by a single box.

@rogerhoward
Copy link

I don't see the parallel to Scotchbox (not familiar with Joomla-vagrantbox, but looks roughly the same) - that's about getting a single stack up and running, for hosting a single application... but am not trying to derail this. Just think it's an overcomplication to try to build a single box that hosts a Jekyll site, a Node application, and other stuff, none of which are interdependencies, compared to just having a Vagrantfile for each. You may be happier just going the Docker route instead...

Feel free to ignore this, just weighing in.

@davidnuon
Copy link
Member Author

@rogerhoward joomla-vagrantbox follows this approach. I'll admit this is weird, but I'll think this is something worth exploring.

@rogerhoward
Copy link

Been there, done that, have the scars to prove it :) Do what you will!

@torch2424
Copy link
Member

giphy

@poproar
Copy link

poproar commented Jun 5, 2016

Thanks @rogerhoward This vagrant box got me going.

@poproar
Copy link

poproar commented Jun 5, 2016

I couldnt get past bundle install on coffeemaker. nokogiri i think. What is the goal of coffeemaker?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants