You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be awesome if parameters (e.g. s3_object_ownership = "BucketOwnerEnforced" vs bucket_ownership_enforced_enabled = true) and features (e.g. lifecycle_configuration_rules) of both would be standardized. Reimplementing one with the other will likely prevent further drift.
Expected Behavior
Standardized parameters/features of similar TF modules.
Use Case
/
Describe Ideal Solution
/
Alternatives Considered
No response
Additional Context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Not sure if this will ever be done as this module is largely stable and reimplementing would require a good deal of re-work by maintainers and consumers of this module.
cc @Nuru as he'll likely have a definitive opinion on whether or not to keep this open 👍
Describe the Feature
I am wondering if there is a specific reason why this https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-tfstate-backend is not implemented with https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-s3-bucket? The parameters and features of both also differ.
It would be awesome if parameters (e.g.
s3_object_ownership = "BucketOwnerEnforced"
vsbucket_ownership_enforced_enabled = true
) and features (e.g.lifecycle_configuration_rules
) of both would be standardized. Reimplementing one with the other will likely prevent further drift.Expected Behavior
Standardized parameters/features of similar TF modules.
Use Case
/
Describe Ideal Solution
/
Alternatives Considered
No response
Additional Context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: