Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider explicitly listing diversity & inclusivity goals #69

Open
jessepollak opened this issue Oct 10, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

Consider explicitly listing diversity & inclusivity goals #69

jessepollak opened this issue Oct 10, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@jessepollak
Copy link
Member

In the words of @techiecheckie on Twitter,

Your recruiting document is trying really hard but not enough. Recruiting diversely means little w/o hiring followup. I'd prefer to see explicit numbered diversity goals rather than, again, vague non-committance. Especially bc you already know your most diverse pool of applicants will come from ppl least likely to get in.

Tweets start here.

@jessepollak
Copy link
Member Author

I'll note that this is something we would really like to do, but have thus far been counseled against it by our HR lawyer for legal reasons. Worth exploring whether there are ways we can set goals around building an inclusive company while staying within the bounds of what's legal!

@techiecheckie
Copy link

Twitter released something like what I'm talking about recently: https://blog.twitter.com/2015/we-re-committing-to-a-more-diverse-twitter
So I doubt it's illegal. I'd bring this document up and see if you can't work something out.

@jessepollak
Copy link
Member Author

Oh, awesome, hadn't seen that! Will discuss with HR and see what we can do :)

@danaoshiro
Copy link

Checking in to pick this thread up again. Am super impressed with this handbook and am currently building something out for my community. Would love to hear how this turned out.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants