Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Query Benchmark Comparison #63

Open
zard1152 opened this issue Jan 13, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

Query Benchmark Comparison #63

zard1152 opened this issue Jan 13, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@zard1152
Copy link

From the benchmark results, I observed that this project both of insertion and query quality is better than LightRAG and GraphRAG. However, both LightRAG and GraphRAG have a common issue: their query time is too long. This has been a major concern for me. I would like to see a comparison chart of query time costs for better clarity.

@liukidar
Copy link
Contributor

Hello, the query procedure is very similar, so the times should be identical. The context size can be reduced (maybe only providing chunks for example) to ensure a faster generation of the answer.
The latency can also be reduced by using local language models (in particular since we "read" the query we need to wait for one LLM call)

@Authorlove
Copy link

Is the processing time of PPR (Personalized PageRank) substantial when dealing with large graphs?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants