Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Proof TJET_LAW #648

Open
wopian opened this issue Feb 20, 2020 · 5 comments · May be fixed by #822
Open

Proof TJET_LAW #648

wopian opened this issue Feb 20, 2020 · 5 comments · May be fixed by #822
Assignees
@dhivyasreedhar
Labels
Size: Moderate 500 to 749 lines
Milestone
Luminary099

Comments

@wopian
Copy link
Collaborator

wopian commented Feb 20, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Proof read transcribed code of TJET_LAW against scans

Lines: 519
Page: 1460—1469 (9)

Reduced quality scans can be found here
@wopian wopian added this to the Luminary099 milestone Feb 20, 2020
@zpeters
Copy link
Contributor

zpeters commented Oct 6, 2020

I will grab this one.

@wopian
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wopian commented Oct 7, 2020

@zpeters go ahead!

@dhivyasreedhar
Copy link

Hi, I want to contribute here. How can I help?

@wopian
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wopian commented Sep 29, 2021

Hi, I want to contribute here. How can I help?

Read through the contributing guide and begin checking the TJET_LAW.agc file against the scans beginning from p1460 to p1469. The relevant page is commented throughout the file.

@dhivyasreedhar dhivyasreedhar linked a pull request Oct 1, 2021 that will close this issue
Open
@dhivyasreedhar
Copy link

Hi, I have proof read the given pages. I have made a pull request #822. Kindly review it.

@wopian wopian linked a pull request Oct 4, 2021 that will close this issue
Proof TJET.LAW #648 #822
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@dhivyasreedhar dhivyasreedhar

Labels
Size: Moderate 500 to 749 lines
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Luminary099
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Proof TJET.LAW #648
3 participants
@zpeters @wopian @dhivyasreedhar