You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When testing the vsuxseg2ei16 instruction, the test case fails under specific conditions. Upon further analysis, it was found that address overlap in the test cases, according to the RISC-V spec description for vsuxseg2ei16,
When the data in v5 has a sequence of difference 2, for example, v5={2,4,... }, the addresses of v3[0] and v2[1] overlap. There exists a scenario where v2[1] can overwrite the value stored by v3[0].
Since the instruction is Indexed-unordered segment stores, when address overlap occurs, the addressable data is theoretically unpredictable
Based on the results of my tests and my personal understanding, I think the test of Indexed-unordered segment stores directive may need further improvement.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description:
When testing the vsuxseg2ei16 instruction, the test case fails under specific conditions. Upon further analysis, it was found that address overlap in the test cases, according to the RISC-V spec description for vsuxseg2ei16,
When the data in v5 has a sequence of difference 2, for example, v5={2,4,... }, the addresses of v3[0] and v2[1] overlap. There exists a scenario where v2[1] can overwrite the value stored by v3[0].
Since the instruction is Indexed-unordered segment stores, when address overlap occurs, the addressable data is theoretically unpredictable
Based on the results of my tests and my personal understanding, I think the test of Indexed-unordered segment stores directive may need further improvement.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: