You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If a P-predicate is created for Match.ANY (and the others) then, when the TraversalStrategy that folds has()-steps into BlazeGraphStep, it can do what it needs with the P-predicate and thus, the following would work:
g = graph.traversal()
g.V().has("key",matches.any("hell*")).count()
The reason that reg-ex (and stuff like geo) are NOT in TinkerPop is that various backends have different semantics for such predicates. Thus, we recommend that graph providers simply create respective P-predicates and GraphStep rules for handling the HasContainers.
I noticed this in the documentation.
If a
P
-predicate is created forMatch.ANY
(and the others) then, when theTraversalStrategy
that foldshas()
-steps intoBlazeGraphStep
, it can do what it needs with theP
-predicate and thus, the following would work:The reason that reg-ex (and stuff like geo) are NOT in TinkerPop is that various backends have different semantics for such predicates. Thus, we recommend that graph providers simply create respective
P
-predicates andGraphStep
rules for handling theHasContainers
.P
-predicates are easy to implement.https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/blob/master/gremlin-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/process/traversal/P.java
has()
-steps.https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/blob/master/tinkergraph-gremlin/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/tinkergraph/process/traversal/strategy/optimization/TinkerGraphStepStrategy.java
GraphStep
implementation.https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/blob/master/tinkergraph-gremlin/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/tinkergraph/process/traversal/step/sideEffect/TinkerGraphStep.java
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: