You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think it would be helpful (especially when writing accounts, but also more generally) to have another map type - showing all cells where breeding has been reported for the species. This could be just a straight binary map (ie red for yes, blank for no breeding data for the square) or it could be based on % of reporting checklists that have breeding codes added.
Once again, low priority so I'll hibernate it for now.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yeah, I like this idea - but I wonder if most species have enough breeding data to provide an informative map (rather than just a few red grid cells here and there)? Also, if we add this map then we'll have 7 maps, which we can't arrange nicely on a grid. So we might also want to think of another map/graph so we can have a the maps/graphs laid out in a 2x4 grid?
I agree that we won't have much data initially, but I think the ideal is that we get more over the course of the project and eventually most common breeders have a decently-filled in map.
As for arranging - could we do one "breeding detection" (binary yes/no) and one "breeding frequency" (scale 0-100%) similar to the other maps?
I think it would be helpful (especially when writing accounts, but also more generally) to have another map type - showing all cells where breeding has been reported for the species. This could be just a straight binary map (ie red for yes, blank for no breeding data for the square) or it could be based on % of reporting checklists that have breeding codes added.
Once again, low priority so I'll hibernate it for now.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: