Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review of the format by additional contributors. #34

Open
4 tasks
ypriverol opened this issue Jan 8, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
4 tasks

Review of the format by additional contributors. #34

ypriverol opened this issue Jan 8, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested

Comments

@ypriverol
Copy link
Member

Currently, the format has been implemented and reviewed by @ypriverol @zprobot; we should aim before the first release to get the review from other developers and bioinformaticians:

  • @daichengxin should give feedback about the format in the context of his project for MSNet.
  • @timosachsenberg and @jpfeuffer should give feedback in the context of OpenMS and see the possibility to export into it (to be discussed during the OpenMS Dev meeting)
  • Get feedback from SAGE and other search engine developers.
  • Present the format to other PSI members for future extensions and possibility to include it into PSI.
@ypriverol ypriverol added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested labels Jan 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants