You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have a case that doesn't produce the desired output: a transfer out of an account, in-kind. This gets categorized as an ASSET_OTHERASSET. I'm not sure I understand the reasoning for why this category cashflows out the cost basis of the other asset. Shouldn't it be outflowing the market value instead?
More generally, in-kind transfers (in or out) don't seem to work correctly for this reason. They only work if both source and target accounts are considered together in a group.
I was testing the same and got issues as well. I also noticed that you add the cost to each leg of the transaction which makes me wonder if in-kind that is a requirement or in-kind transfer will deduce that from the inventory itself (let's say we use FIFO or LIFO).
@redstreet
I have a case that doesn't produce the desired output: a transfer out of an account, in-kind. This gets categorized as an ASSET_OTHERASSET. I'm not sure I understand the reasoning for why this category cashflows out the cost basis of the other asset. Shouldn't it be outflowing the market value instead?
More generally, in-kind transfers (in or out) don't seem to work correctly for this reason. They only work if both source and target accounts are considered together in a group.
Desired (meaningful) output: 12% CAGR
Actual output: 0.00% (since the cashflow is -1000 for the buy, and +1000 for the transfer).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: