Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

As a decision maker I want to view a staff recommendation and make a decision for a RUP awaiting decision so that timely decisions are made and recorded. #259

Open
21 tasks
LisaMoore1 opened this issue Oct 16, 2019 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@LisaMoore1
Copy link
Collaborator

LisaMoore1 commented Oct 16, 2019

REQUIREMENTS

  • Decision Maker (DM) can open a RUP awaiting decision from the queue
  • all sections of the RUP can be viewed but not edited
  • staff recommendation is easily accessed for review
  • DM has option to "Make decision now"
  • DM sees approval checklist which includes
    • conforms with FRPA
    • includes actions sufficient to address Minister's Issues
    • includes measures to prevent the introduction or spread of invasive plants
    • is consistent with other requirements including those identified in "additional requirements"
    • has had sufficient consultation
  • all items in approval checklist must be checked if the decision maker wishes to "approve" an RUP/mandatory amendment
  • DM can select from "Approve", "Approve with Conditions", "Not Approved - Further Work Required", "Not Approved"
  • if "Approve with Conditions" is selected the decision maker must select which (checkbox?) which conditions they wish to include
  • the DM may edit the conditions submitted by staff
  • the DM may add a condition not identified by the staff person
  • the DM must enter text into a field labelled "Decision Rationale" for all "not approved" decisions
  • the DM may enter text into a field labelled "Decision Rationale" for "approved" decisions
  • where the DM selects "Not approved - Further Work Required" the further work described by the staff is visible and the DM may either leave as is or edit before making decision
  • the DM sees "confirm" (signing) language prior to confirming they wish to make the decision
  • approval decisions result in a change of status to the plan (to reflect that it is or will be current legal when the start date is reached)
  • not-approved decisions are moved back (and identifiable) to the staff work queue for them to discuss the outcome with the AH using the preferred communication method
    0DBF33B1-441D-4F8F-A788-44E1D15F1402.jpeg
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant