Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

psp-6988 File tabs fix #3575

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 7, 2023
Merged

Conversation

devinleighsmith
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@devinleighsmith devinleighsmith added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 6, 2023
@devinleighsmith devinleighsmith self-assigned this Nov 6, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 6, 2023

✅ No secrets were detected in the code.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 6, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #3575 (89d0466) into dev (f557de3) will increase coverage by 4.99%.
The diff coverage is 65.21%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev    #3575      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   69.53%   74.53%   +4.99%     
==========================================
  Files        1369      898     -471     
  Lines       33704    18575   -15129     
  Branches     6264     5244    -1020     
==========================================
- Hits        23436    13844    -9592     
+ Misses      10017     4731    -5286     
+ Partials      251        0     -251     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 74.53% <65.21%> (+4.99%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
...eatures/mapSideBar/acquisition/AcquisitionView.tsx 49.09% <ø> (ø)
...mapSideBar/research/tabs/ResearchTabsContainer.tsx 94.73% <100.00%> (+18.26%) ⬆️
...pSideBar/acquisition/router/FilePropertyRouter.tsx 70.96% <91.66%> (+5.34%) ⬆️
...rc/features/mapSideBar/research/ResearchRouter.tsx 87.50% <87.50%> (ø)
.../src/features/mapSideBar/research/ResearchView.tsx 85.71% <85.71%> (ø)
...mapSideBar/shared/detail/PropertyFileContainer.tsx 96.15% <50.00%> (-3.85%) ⬇️
...src/features/mapSideBar/property/InventoryTabs.tsx 31.25% <10.00%> (-24.31%) ⬇️
...features/mapSideBar/research/ResearchContainer.tsx 54.20% <50.00%> (-0.54%) ⬇️

... and 473 files with indirect coverage changes

@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ jobs:
- name: call scripts to upgrade database
shell: bash
run: |
oc process -f ./openshift/4.0/templates/jobs/db-deploy.yaml -p SERVER_NAME=sqldevtst.th.gov.bc.ca -p DB_NAME=PIMS_DEV -p NAMESPACE=3cd915-dev | oc create -f - | grep -oP "(?<=job\.batch/)[^\s]*" | (read JOB_NAME; oc wait --for=condition=complete job/$JOB_NAME --timeout=120s)
oc process -f ./openshift/4.0/templates/jobs/db-deploy.yaml -p DB_SECRET_NAME=pims-database GIT_BRANCH=dev SERVER_NAME=sqldevtst.th.gov.bc.ca -p DB_NAME=PIMS_DEV -p NAMESPACE=3cd915-dev | oc create -f - | grep -oP "(?<=job\.batch/)[^\s]*" | (read JOB_NAME; oc wait --for=condition=complete job/$JOB_NAME --timeout=120s)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this doesn't seem related to that story but I guess we can fix it anyways?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was from #3573, removed from this PR.

Comment on lines 68 to 73
- name: GIT_BRANCH
description: the git branch to pull the database scripts from.
required: true
- name: DB_SECRET_NAME
description: the git branch to pull the database scripts from.
required: true
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Question - I'm assuming the corresponding secrets have been updated/configured in OCP?

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 6, 2023

✅ No secrets were detected in the code.

@devinleighsmith devinleighsmith merged commit 0f727a5 into bcgov:dev Nov 7, 2023
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants