You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If a user submits a feature definition that is rejected but not closed, they can't easily use Assemble to make fixes to their submission.
Currently, they can:
Copy and paste the feature definition from the PR into a new Assemble session, create a submission, and close the old PR
Resort to doing everything with git
Some ideas to support editing features:
add a launch Assemble badge as a comment on PRs that are failing that allows the current branch to be checked out in Assemble (need to specify the ref in the binder url)
navigate the file browser to the file containing the changed feature for user to copy/paste it into Analysis notebook, or somehow prefill the feature definition into a notebook
somehow detect that the user is on not on the default branch
else, detect the branch name, check out that branch, detect the feature name, edit that file with the new code contents (overwrite it completely), commit it. rest of logic should be the same. need to double check behavior of create new pull request API in this case
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If a user submits a feature definition that is rejected but not closed, they can't easily use Assemble to make fixes to their submission.
Currently, they can:
Some ideas to support editing features:
launch Assemble
badge as a comment on PRs that are failing that allows the current branch to be checked out in Assemble (need to specify the ref in the binder url)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: