You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The manual does not make it clear whether the first point of BODY must be S=P=R=ZU=ZL=0.0, but get weird pitching behaviour if the first point of the fuselage is not defined as ZU=ZL=0.
I see strong positive Cm when lowering the nose cone ("Tu-144D cone 17.0" vs. "Tu-144D"):
The manual does not make it clear whether the first point of BODY must be S=P=R=ZU=ZL=0.0, but get weird pitching behaviour if the first point of the fuselage is not defined as ZU=ZL=0.
I see strong positive Cm when lowering the nose cone ("Tu-144D cone 17.0" vs. "Tu-144D"):
https://gitlab.com/mdanil/Tu-144_src/blob/datcom_update/DATCOM/results_190426/Tu-144D.dcm
https://gitlab.com/mdanil/Tu-144_src/blob/datcom_update/DATCOM/results_190426/Tu-144D/output.dat
When I put an additional point with ZU=ZL=0, I get reasonable down pitching, at the same time CD and CL change a bit less:
https://gitlab.com/mdanil/Tu-144_src/blob/datcom_update/DATCOM/results_190429/Tu-144D.dcm
https://gitlab.com/mdanil/Tu-144_src/blob/datcom_update/DATCOM/results_190429/Tu-144D/output.dat
Is this a known limitation?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: