diff --git a/Sources/ServiceContextModule/ServiceContext.swift b/Sources/ServiceContextModule/ServiceContext.swift
index 8500b60..e7b44fb 100644
--- a/Sources/ServiceContextModule/ServiceContext.swift
+++ b/Sources/ServiceContextModule/ServiceContext.swift
@@ -257,14 +257,12 @@ extension ServiceContext {
     }
 
     @available(*, deprecated, message: "Use the method with the isolation parameter instead.")
+    // Deprecated trick to avoid executor hop here; 6.0 introduces the proper replacement: #isolation
     @_disfavoredOverload
     public static func withValue<T>(_ value: ServiceContext?, operation: () async throws -> T) async rethrows -> T {
         try await ServiceContext.$current.withValue(value, operation: operation)
     }
     #else
-    // Deprecated trick to avoid executor hop here; 6.0 introduces the proper replacement: #isolation
-    @available(*, deprecated, message: "Prefer withValue(_:isolation:operation:)")
-    @_disfavoredOverload
     @_unsafeInheritExecutor
     public static func withValue<T>(_ value: ServiceContext?, operation: () async throws -> T) async rethrows -> T {
         try await ServiceContext.$current.withValue(value, operation: operation)
diff --git a/Tests/ServiceContextTests/ServiceContextTests.swift b/Tests/ServiceContextTests/ServiceContextTests.swift
index 496c23c..476be07 100644
--- a/Tests/ServiceContextTests/ServiceContextTests.swift
+++ b/Tests/ServiceContextTests/ServiceContextTests.swift
@@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ final class ServiceContextTests: XCTestCase {
             ServiceContext.withValue(.topLevel) {
                 value = 12  // should produce no warnings
             }
+            await ServiceContext.withValue(.topLevel) { () async in
+                value = 12  // should produce no warnings
+            }
         }
     }