Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about a license #9

Open
pluskal opened this issue Sep 16, 2015 · 8 comments
Open

Question about a license #9

pluskal opened this issue Sep 16, 2015 · 8 comments

Comments

@pluskal
Copy link
Contributor

pluskal commented Sep 16, 2015

Hello anagram4wander,

would it be possible to add an open-source license, best if it be https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT.

I would like to extend this project and include it in my open-source SW.

Thanks, JP

@LeeHoward1
Copy link

Hi anagram4wander,

I too would like to know what license your code is released under. Specifically, I would need the license explicitly stated somewhere. A license file in the root directory is a typical way to do this. Please let me know if you don't intend to add a license, since I won't be able to use your code in that case.

Thanks,

Lee

@anagram4wander
Copy link
Owner

Open license - feel free to use it.

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 18, 2016, at 11:08 AM, LeeHoward1 [email protected] wrote:

Hi anagram4wander,

I too would like to know what license your code is released under. Specifically, I would need the license explicitly stated somewhere. A license file in the root directory is a typical way to do this. Please let me know if you don't intend to add a license, since I won't be able to use your code in that case.

Thanks,

Lee


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub

@LeeHoward1
Copy link

Thanks for the quick reply. I work for a company that requires any code we use to have a specified license. Would you consider applying one of the available licenses? Perhaps the MIT license, which essentially captures the "Open license" features?

@anagram4wander
Copy link
Owner

The mit license is fine.. I will update when I get a chance...

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 18, 2016, at 11:35 AM, LeeHoward1 [email protected] wrote:

Thanks for the quick reply. I work for a company that requires any code we use to have a specified license. Would you consider applying one of the available licenses? Perhaps the MIT license, which essentially captures the "Open license" features?


You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub

@LeeHoward1
Copy link

Okay, thank you!

@WilhelmJP
Copy link

Hello anagram4wander,

for the same reasons as Lee, I am also very interested in getting your lib in connection with the proposed MIT license. Could you please tell me if this is not possible in the near future?

Thanks,
Wilhelm

@sjb-sjb
Copy link

sjb-sjb commented Jul 19, 2017

I agree with the comments on licensing, which I see have been open for a year or so. We need a license posted on the GitHub page. It may be great software but without a posted license it is not usable.

@michael-fraser-epm
Copy link

The license file was never committed to the Main branch. Can someone please add the MIT license to the main branch?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants