Extract the abstract syntax tree from a latex math expression

[bhpayne]

Latex is for presentation. Getting an abstract syntax tree for a Latex math expression is a critical step for searchability and semantic enrichment.

1. Parse the Latex expression into symbols (like a, b, x_1, \vec{z}) and operators (*, \int, >)
2. create an abstract syntax tree for the symbols and operators

Caveat: scientists aren't consistent in their notation, so there might be conflicting ways to interpret a Latex math string.

Caveat: not all symbols to be identified are in the string. For example, a b might refer to "a multiplied by b"

[bhpayne]

While an arbitrary AST would be great, currently the Physics Derivation Graph uses SymPy to check steps. SymPy's Latex-to-AST is impressive.

My struggles with SymPy:

• https://physicsderivationgraph.blogspot.com/2020/07/function-latex-for-sympy.html
• https://physicsderivationgraph.blogspot.com/2020/09/representing-laplace-operator-nabla-in.html
• https://physicsderivationgraph.blogspot.com/2020/07/quantum-bra-ket-dirac-notation-in-sympy.html

and a reminder to myself on SymPy's process:
https://physicsderivationgraph.blogspot.com/2020/08/how-to-edit-sympy-latex-parser-and.html