Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use a more descriptive name? #15

Open
devmotion opened this issue Apr 20, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Use a more descriptive name? #15

devmotion opened this issue Apr 20, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@devmotion
Copy link

IPMeasures is a nice short name but IMO it is easy to miss this package (as I did though I'm working with integral probability measures) since it's not a well-known abbreviation (at least not to me 😄). So maybe it would be easier to find this package if it was named "IntegralProbabilityMeasures.jl" instead? If you don't want to write out this long name in packages that dependent on IPMeasures, you can always define a custom alias in these packages such as const IPMeasures = IntegralProbabilityMeasures.

@nmheim
Copy link
Member

nmheim commented Apr 21, 2020

Thats a good idea, I'll do that as soon as I find some time for plumbing! :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants