Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support both standard and FIFO SQS queues #489

Open
blefebvre opened this issue Dec 13, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Support both standard and FIFO SQS queues #489

blefebvre opened this issue Dec 13, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
@blefebvre

Comments

@blefebvre
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Sending an SQS message to a non-FIFO queue will fail if the messageGroupId param is provided to the sendMessage function. The function should only include this param when it is sending a message to a FIFO queue.
@blefebvre blefebvre self-assigned this Dec 13, 2024
@blefebvre blefebvre mentioned this issue Dec 13, 2024
Merged
ssilare-adobe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 13, 2024
@blefebvre
fix(sqs): Support both standard and FIFO SQS queues (#490)
4a975b0 
Currently, sending an SQS message to a standard (non-FIFO) queue will
fail if the `messageGroupId` param is provided to the `sendMessage`
function. The function should only include this param when it is sending
a message to a FIFO queue.

## Related Issues

- #489
adobe-bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 13, 2024
@semantic-release-bot
chore(release): 1.23.7 [skip ci]
7ce4bc1 
# [@adobe/spacecat-shared-utils-v1.23.7](https://github.com/adobe/spacecat-shared/compare/@adobe/spacecat-shared-utils-v1.23.6...@adobe/spacecat-shared-utils-v1.23.7) (2024-12-13)

### Bug Fixes

* **sqs:** Support both standard and FIFO SQS queues ([#490](#490)) ([4a975b0](4a975b0)), closes [#489](#489)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@blefebvre blefebvre

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@blefebvre