Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Partners/Sponsors/Job Offer page #168

Open
2 tasks
werthen opened this issue May 3, 2017 · 5 comments
Open
2 tasks

Partners/Sponsors/Job Offer page #168

werthen opened this issue May 3, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@werthen
Copy link
Member

werthen commented May 3, 2017

A page where partners/sponsors can put their job offers.

  • A link shortener/redirecter should be made which would log all the visits to a certain company's website
  • Urge the user to mention us in the job application

I propose just putting us as the middle man, providing a communication point with us instead of the company in question. This adds a little work, but gives us a clear overview, and allows some form of quality control and feedback.
-- @wschella

@ninewise
Copy link
Member

ninewise commented May 3, 2017

lol vtk much

@wschella
Copy link
Member

We should make sure we have very decent click ( and behavior? ) monitoring here, as to advocate our value and contribution. Further, it should be clear that we should be contacted in case of interest, as to be able to monitor or results, both for us, and for the companies in the program.

@werthen
Copy link
Member Author

werthen commented May 28, 2017

The first problem can be solved quite easily. A home made link shortener which logs all the necessary info can be made in no time

Second problem however would need some communication from the company, unless we want to set up an automatic way to interface and communicate with those companies, but that's a lot of work for little pay-off.

@wschella
Copy link
Member

wschella commented May 28, 2017

For the second problem I propose just putting us as the middle man, providing a communication point with us instead of the company in question. This adds a little work, but gives us a clear overview, and allows some form of quality control and feedback.

@werthen
Copy link
Member Author

werthen commented May 28, 2017

The issue has been updated to reflect this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants