You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be nice if your color picker used your pure-color value format as a value for input and output instead of rgba string. This would cut down on parsing and converting inside the color picker and would allow users to use your pure-color lib to manage formats how they need to outside of the color picker.
I realize this would break the current API but tis only a suggestion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I've considered this a few times. I may even have a branch locally where I've done this. Though I can't remember why I never settled on it? I'll think about it again :)
Are you having perf issues, or is this just an idea?
Just an idea, there are no performance issues but currently the data is going through this transformation: data -> convert to rgbastring -> color-picker -> parse to pure-color -> change happens -> convert to rgbastring -> calback with rgbastring -> parse rgbastring -> convert to data
it could be data -> convert to pure-color -> color-picker -> change happens -> -> calback with pure-color -> convert to data
It would be nice if your color picker used your pure-color value format as a value for input and output instead of rgba string. This would cut down on parsing and converting inside the color picker and would allow users to use your pure-color lib to manage formats how they need to outside of the color picker.
I realize this would break the current API but tis only a suggestion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: