We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cc:
Hi
This is a bug of the change introduced in #389 .
When submitting the Arhive.zip file in #399, skeleton code is mysteriously included in current sem submissions' comparisons
Arhive.zip
This is because there's a careless mistake in the comparison in https://github.com/WING-NUS/SSID/blob/0fb4da9054d0148605f65cc050a426866e7dfb5a/lib/java/PlagiarismDetection/src/pd/SimComparer.java#L82C5-L82C5 , whereby the s2 submission should be from the currentSemSubmissions variable instead of submissions.
currentSemSubmissions
submissions
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Archive.zip
Correct comparisons made
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Fix WING-NUS#401 Wrong comparison when comparing submissions within c…
c70546c
…urrent sem
4f38822
823a069
sibinhho99
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Cc:
Hi
Describe the Bug
This is a bug of the change introduced in #389 .
When submitting the
Arhive.zip
file in #399, skeleton code is mysteriously included in current sem submissions' comparisonsThis is because there's a careless mistake in the comparison in
https://github.com/WING-NUS/SSID/blob/0fb4da9054d0148605f65cc050a426866e7dfb5a/lib/java/PlagiarismDetection/src/pd/SimComparer.java#L82C5-L82C5 , whereby the s2 submission should be from the
currentSemSubmissions
variable instead ofsubmissions
.To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Archive.zip
file in 🐛 Bug when handling skeleton code after implementing references #399Expected Behavior
Correct comparisons made
Tasks
Acceptance Criteria
More Information
Environment
Screenshots
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: