Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request - Cantera input file #87

Open
xenhua opened this issue Aug 22, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

Feature request - Cantera input file #87

xenhua opened this issue Aug 22, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@xenhua
Copy link

xenhua commented Aug 22, 2019

It would be great if pMuTT can be extended to directly write the "Cantera" input files (the format of .cti files)

Cantera, being an opensource and a free software, it is supposed to have a more wider user base than the proprietary software Chemkin.

Prof. Vlachos' earlier publication on the microkinetics of wgs reaction is the testimony for this.

@jonlym jonlym added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 23, 2019
@jonlym
Copy link
Member

jonlym commented Aug 23, 2019

Thank you for the suggestion. We're currently working on this but it's still in its early stages.

Currently, we support writing Nasa, Nasa9, and Shomate polynomials to CTI format but the other aspects need to be developed.

@xenhua
Copy link
Author

xenhua commented Aug 23, 2019

I am extremely delighted to know of the current developments in pMuTT to write the cantera cti file.

From the same "Kinetic Models" page on ReadTheDocs page, I see that you are also working on a cti format for "OpenMKM". I believe OpenMKM is the MKM tool that you said Vlachos Group will showcase in AIChE 2019 meeting.

How different or same is this .cti file from cantera .cti file.

@jonlym
Copy link
Member

jonlym commented Aug 23, 2019

The format is more-or-less identical. The largest differences currently is the implementation of coverage effects and surface reactions.

Cantera definitely has a wide range of functionality, which may take a lot of work for pMuTT to have comprehensive coverage.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants