To calculate radius of turns, use this formula
velocity^2 / (9.81 * tan(bankAngle))
where velocity is in m/s and bankAngle in whatever the tan function takes
Percentage of a full turn when doing an "impossible turn" (180º followed by two 30º turns):
(180+30+30)/360 = 66,66666%
Radius of turn at 45º and 76kt:
-> To make a safe turn at 45º the airspeed has to be increased to at least 1.44*Vs (1.5*Vs is recommended)
(velocity*1.44)^2 / (9.81 * tan(bankAngle)) = 323m = 1060ft
Circumference of circle:
2 * π * 323m = 2030m
Distance covered during circle (2780m is the glide distance per 1000ft height loss for the C172):
2030m * 67% = 1360.1m (or 49% of 2780m)
Height loss to glide distance (convert to actual feet height loss):
1000ft * 0.49 = 490ft
Comparing against numbers from a brilliant AOPA article yields an error of about 8% (450ft vs. 490ft). While off by a bit, it errors on the side of caution and provides a reasonable safety margin.
Using 1.5\*Vs
yields a height loss of 530ft which is a whopping ~8% increase from 1.44\*Vs
!
Given climb rate and airspeed:
climb:
rate: 3.09
speed: 79
The speed in KIAS (ignorantly skipping KCAS) is equal to KTAS in a standard atmosphere at MSL.
Speed converted to m/s:
40,67m/s
Duration to climb to 1000m:
1000m / 3.09m/s = 323,62s
Distance travelled diagonally:
40,67m/s * 323,62s = 13161.6254m
Calculating the ground track via pythagoras:
sqrt(1000m^2 + 13161.6254m^2) ~= 13200m
Converting to a slope:
13200m / 1000m = 13.2
For each X height gained, slope * X ground distance is covered.
Example: Climbing 2.000ft -> 2000ft * ~13.2 = 26.400ft = 4.344879nm POH: 4nm
More comparisons:
Height | Calculation | POH |
---|---|---|
1000 | 2.17244 | 2 |
2000 | 4.344879 | 4 |
3000 | 6.517319 | 6 |
4000 | 8.689758 | 8 |
=> It appears that the POH is rounding and that past 3000ft the reduced climb-rate is affecting accuracy (albeit into the direction of more tolerance in terms of having an engine failure)
Calculate ratio between 1000ft (304.8m) and distance (example C172):
2800m / 304.8m = 9.18
- Write a tool to generate "derived" values
- Climp factor (e.g. 13.2 for C172)
- Glide factor (e.g. 9.18 for C172)