You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In my optioning the example contains two security risks:
tecnativa/docker-socket-proxy on Docker Hub (link) defaults to latest, which is already 3 years old. Please either update latest tag on Docker Hub to a more current version or add the edge tag to the usage example.
The example uses -privileged, which gives a lot of permissions to the container, even though this is not required, it runs without any issue on plain Debian without the parameter. If there are exceptions, they should be noted, but --privileged should not be assumed to be default, and in 2024 there should be more granular options.
Combining a 3 year old image with --privileged seems to be a very insecure usage example for novice users. The project is intended to improve security, but the example seems very counter-productive.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The README.md shows this usage example:
In my optioning the example contains two security risks:
tecnativa/docker-socket-proxy
on Docker Hub (link) defaults tolatest
, which is already 3 years old. Please either updatelatest
tag on Docker Hub to a more current version or add theedge
tag to the usage example.-privileged
, which gives a lot of permissions to the container, even though this is not required, it runs without any issue on plain Debian without the parameter. If there are exceptions, they should be noted, but--privileged
should not be assumed to be default, and in 2024 there should be more granular options.Combining a 3 year old image with
--privileged
seems to be a very insecure usage example for novice users. The project is intended to improve security, but the example seems very counter-productive.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: