Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: Project-wide setting of "main" model files #146

Open
CSchoel opened this issue Aug 17, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Feature request: Project-wide setting of "main" model files #146

CSchoel opened this issue Aug 17, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
feature a new feature good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@CSchoel
Copy link
Member

CSchoel commented Aug 17, 2020

To reduce the amount of clicks needed to simulate a project, it would be beneficial if we could somehow (maybe through a configuration file in the project?) specify the following information:

  • Which file or Modelica class in the project is the "readme file/class" that explains what the project is about? This will usually be a "project.mo" file, but could also be a "README.md" or some model file that contains the main simulation use case. This file should be opened by default, when a project is opened.
  • Which Modelica class in the project is the "default model" that should be pre-selected for running simulations? This class should be selected by default when jumping to the simulate tab of a project (unless another project file was opened in the editor, of course).
@njustus njustus added the feature a new feature label Sep 5, 2020
@njustus
Copy link
Member

njustus commented Sep 5, 2020

Through a configuration file is a good idea. For the "readme" i would recommend the default behaviour from code hosting platform: *search for a readme.md`.

@njustus njustus added the good first issue Good for newcomers label Sep 5, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature a new feature good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants